Much of the story takes place in a school building that was once the home of gothic author R. M. Holland. His ghost story is given to us piecemeal throughout the book. His wife died in the home and is said to haunt the building. An old mystery hangs over the school about how she died—accident, suicide, or homicide—and a mystery of his daughter if there was one. Two current murders of teachers from the school are the central plot.
Three main characters switch first-person points of view—Police Detective Harbinder, English teacher Clare, and Clare’s teenage daughter Georgia—all well-written with distinct and likable personalities. One small problem with the plot is that we know that two of Harbinder’s main suspects, Clare and Georgia, are not the villain because we follow them throughout the story. The author left no hints about the actual killer until close to the end (or did I miss them?).
I like reading mysteries and crime novels by British authors. There’s something about the style that’s different from American authors. Griffiths is new to me, and I’ll look for more books by her.
There is something about a good British police procedural
that captures my imagination. Lodge gives a step-by-step description of the
police unraveling the clues to find the killer of a young woman, Zoe. The crime
looks like a suicide, but Zoe’s boyfriend is watching via Skype when someone creeps
into her apartment and her bathroom. He anonymously reports it to the police.
The author follows the four policemen on the case and
several of the victim’s friends, who are all suspects, giving us insights into
all the characters and their relationships with the crime and the victim. She
also goes back in time for the story of Zoe’s time leading up to her murder.
The writing style is methodical and detailed but holds your
attention from beginning to end. I had a vague idea of who killed Zoe before
the reveal at the end.
Good writing, good plot, good characters.
Even though this book is the ninth in a series, it’s my
first book by the author. It reads well as a stand-alone. From some of the
reviews I read, I might get tired of the characters if I read all nine.
I found Slaughter’s unique style of writing fascinating. She
covered the exact same events in the same timeframe in separate chapters from
different characters’ points of view. Although interesting, it probably could
have been done without repeating all the details and action multiple times. The
book is looonng!
Good writing, good plotting, interesting characters (both
good and evil), lots of themes, lots of action, but very dark, needs some fact-checking,
and her political POV is sometimes overbearing.
corrupts absolutely.” Lord Acton, 1887
Let me first say that I’m an eighty-year-old woman who loves to read most fiction genres. I receive my books from the local library Books by Mail program. Most are not specific requests and they cover a wonderful variety of subjects and styles. Second, I almost didn’t start this novel because it’s a sequel to a book I haven’t read, and reviews indicated it was aimed at a young audience with a theme about social media, which I avoid.
But I loved this book (even without reading the previous
installment). It’s not only about the abuse of money and power, it’s about
humanity, encompassing our worst and best traits and in between.
I’ve read Dean Koontz in the past with mixed feelings. Some are excellent and some I haven’t finished due to lack of interest. This one is somewhere in between. The differences in Koontz’s writing styles makes me wonder if he uses ghostwriters, or if he has multiple personalities.
Devoted is a mix
of fantasy, suspense, genetics SF, horror, psychological thriller, paranormal, and
maybe a “shaggy dog story” without the humor. It’s the story of an intelligent
dog, Kipp, and an autistic eleven-year-old boy, Woody, who has never spoken a
word. The boy screams a psychic cry for help that is picked up by “The Wire,” a
telepathic communication network for a group of dogs. Kipp comes to the rescue.
My biggest problem with this book is the characters all appear to be seen from the point of view of the dog. All the people are either very bad (haters, liars, greedy, etc.) or unbelievably good (loving, truth-tellers, sympathetic, loyal, etc.). The good people have no bad characteristics, and the bad have no good. And of course, all the dogs are noble.
The best part of the book is the hopeful ending.
Hikers find a girl’s bones off the Appalachian Trail in
northern Georgia. They turn out to be the remains of a girl gone missing 15
years earlier, a suspected victim of dead serial kidnapper Jacob Ness. The incident
brings together a team of crime investigators, led by FBI agent Kimberly Quincy.
She recruits a group from Boston who have been tracking Ness’s crimes—police
sergeant D.D. Warren, civilian kidnap-survivor Flora Dane, and Flora’s sidekick,
computer guru Keith Edgar.
The book combines police procedural and thriller. The first
part, mostly procedural and introduction to the characters if you haven’t
followed the series, is a bit boring if you’ve followed Gardner’s novels. The
pace picks up as it goes along, and the crimes and criminals pile up. The last
few chapters are action-packed. The story pace feels like a train slowly
chugging out of the station, picking up some speed as it goes through the city,
then turning into high-speed rail.
The plot is chilling. Hopefully no real towns exist like the
one in this story. Gardner’s excellent writing kept me reading even through the
early slow chapters.
The pace and the proliferation of characters keep my rating
at 4 stars, not 5. I would prefer fewer POV characters. Four women carry the
story, each picking up separate pieces of information—Kimberly, D.D., Flora,
and a girl without a name or voice who is held captive by the bad guys.
Even with these flaws, When
You See Me is an excellent read. I recommend it, and I recommend that if
you haven’t read other Lisa Gardner books…do it now!
Sara is running from a Hurricane headed for the Outer Banks
of North Carolina and also trying to escape witness protection. She rescues two
children, Cassie and Boon, who are home alone in the apartment next door. She’s
torn between finding someplace to drop the children and staying off the radar,
so the agents don’t track her.
All the characters are intense and twisted but interesting.
I’m not sure who the title character is supposed to be, since everyone is lying
and/or a liar’s child. Hank, a retired sheriff, is almost unnecessary to the
plot. He’s haunted by a missing son who disappeared years earlier at age ten.
Whit, Cassie and Boon’s father, is dealing with the disappearance of his wife
while holding down a demanding job and taking care of the two children. Cassie,
age twelve, tries to fit in with the older kids in the neighborhood by dressing
Goth. Five-year-old Boon sleeps in his closet.
The story feels repetitive at times, but each time we see the “facts” from a different point of view, we learn a little more of the “truth.” It kept my interest to the end, and I liked the ending.
The Current is a
strange story written in a strange style, and it leaves unanswered questions at
the end. It’s closer to real life where everything doesn’t get neatly tied up. There
is mystery here, but not your typical “whodunit” mystery, maybe a literary
I enjoyed the story, but it took a little while to
understand the flow. At times Johnston writes stream
of consciousness, sometimes he uses second person POV, head-hopping from
one character to another, and he skips back and forth between timelines. But he
digs deep into the psyches of his characters—love, hate, grief, curiosity, need-to-know,
vengeance—and tells all that is going on around them—sights, smells, heat and
cold, sounds, skin sensations.
I enjoyed the book but only gave it four stars. It grabbed
my attention, my heart, and my mind. But the author could have made it a little
easier to follow without losing the grip of the story.
I have not read any of the previous books in this series, which
may be a disadvantage in reading Kingdom
of the Blind, but it reads well as a stand-alone.
The cozy comfort of the small town of Three Pines stands in
stark contrast to the back streets of Montreal. Some of the gatherings of Gamache’s
family or friends in the village, discussing the murder or just babbling about
life, at times seemed confusing or unnecessary, possibly due to my
unfamiliarity with the characters. But these gatherings were comfortable,
friendly, and humorous. The story is filled with family connections (both
relational and families of friends or coworkers), some full of love and
understanding and some underlined with distrust.
One unusual thing about Penny’s writing is her use of
omniscient point of view. You might even call it “head-hopping.” She often jumps
POV from one character to another and back. I found it distracting at times,
but overall, she did a reasonable job of making it feel seamless.
The setting in Canadian winter made me feel the chill and
the crunch of the snow underfoot. The plot was interesting. Occasionally I was
ahead of the story and guessed what would happen, other times I was surprised.
I may go back in time and read other novels in Ms. Penny’s Gamache
Never Tell is a
book of secrets told from three women’s POVs. Evie Carter finds her husband
dead—murder or suicide—picks up the gun and shoots his computer. Homicide
detective D.D. Warren knows Evie as a girl who sixteen years ago “accidentally”
shot and killed her own father. D.D.’s civilian informant, Flora Dane, sees a
picture of Evie’s dead husband and recognizes him as someone she met while a
kidnap victim of Jacob Ness.
The three distinctive characters are well-defined and
interesting, revealing secrets as the story progresses and uncovering other
secrets about Evie’s husband, father, and mother, and about Flora’s kidnapper. Peripheral
characters are also distinct and interesting. The setting is in Boston, my
favorite city. The complex plot kept me guessing.
An excellent novel by a first-rate author.