Even though this book is the ninth in a series, it’s my
first book by the author. It reads well as a stand-alone. From some of the
reviews I read, I might get tired of the characters if I read all nine.
I found Slaughter’s unique style of writing fascinating. She
covered the exact same events in the same timeframe in separate chapters from
different characters’ points of view. Although interesting, it probably could
have been done without repeating all the details and action multiple times. The
book is looonng!
Good writing, good plotting, interesting characters (both
good and evil), lots of themes, lots of action, but very dark, needs some fact-checking,
and her political POV is sometimes overbearing.
corrupts absolutely.” Lord Acton, 1887
Let me first say that I’m an eighty-year-old woman who loves to read most fiction genres. I receive my books from the local library Books by Mail program. Most are not specific requests and they cover a wonderful variety of subjects and styles. Second, I almost didn’t start this novel because it’s a sequel to a book I haven’t read, and reviews indicated it was aimed at a young audience with a theme about social media, which I avoid.
But I loved this book (even without reading the previous
installment). It’s not only about the abuse of money and power, it’s about
humanity, encompassing our worst and best traits and in between.
Lisa Gardner creates interesting characters and manages to
keep them entertaining through multiple books. I can read them out of order,
which I did, and still enjoy each book.
The plot of Look for
Me is twisted, with multiple suspects for the murder of a family. One
daughter, Roxy Baez, survives because she is walking the dogs. Then she
disappears. Boston police detective D.D. Warren looks for her with the help of survivor
turned vigilante, Flora Dane. Is Roxy running from fear, or is she the shooter?
Another excellent tale by Ms. Gardner.
Peter Ash goes to Memphis to help Wanda Wyatt, who has been
receiving strange threats since purchasing an old house and moving in. When he
arrives, he finds someone has driven a dump truck into the front of Wanda’s
house. While trying to track down who might have done it, A young thief, a
homeless street musician, steals Peter’s pickup truck. Peter decides to help
the young musician, too.
I like Peter, even though he often makes stupid and risky
decisions. (He always gets out of the dangerous situations where these
decisions lead him.) All of the characters in the story are interesting, even
the bad guys. Plenty of bad guys populate the book—the young boys, who rob a
jewelry store; a farmer and his psycho brother, who are trying to drive Wanda
out of her house; the gang boss of the Memphis drug world and his close
associates, who are chasing the boy that stole Peter’s truck; and more. Even
Peter and his friend Lewis are not always on the right side of the law.
Suspend your disbelief, and you will enjoy the story.
I intended to read this book years ago and finally got to
it. I won’t go into great detail. There are plenty of reviews available with so
much detail you almost don’t need to read the book.
There are two plots. The story begins with Mikael Blomkvist’s
conviction for libel for an article he wrote about billionaire businessman
Wennerström. This plot line stays in the background until late in the book.
Mikael is then hired by Vander, another rich man, to write a family history as
a cover to find out what happened to his granddaughter, Harriet, who
disappeared almost forty years earlier. This is the plot that consumes most of
The book covers many subjects including business greed and
crime, abuse of women, twisted family relationships, journalism ethics, Swedish
Nazism, computer hacking, and more.
There are also two main characters: Mikael Blomkvist and
Lisbeth Salander, (the girl with the dragon tattoo). Lisbeth doesn’t get
involved with the investigation until about halfway through the story, but we
follow what she is doing before that. Larsson gives us great detail about both
of these very different characters.
I enjoyed the book from the beginning, even though the first
half was rather slow with too much detail about clothes, meals, and day-to-day
minutia. Mikael spends a lot of time on the family history and very little on
the missing girl until way into the book.
The climax of the story occurs about three-quarters of the
way through. The rest of the book ties up all the loose ends, including the first
Larsson’s writing kept me interested from beginning to end.
Never Tell is a
book of secrets told from three women’s POVs. Evie Carter finds her husband
dead—murder or suicide—picks up the gun and shoots his computer. Homicide
detective D.D. Warren knows Evie as a girl who sixteen years ago “accidentally”
shot and killed her own father. D.D.’s civilian informant, Flora Dane, sees a
picture of Evie’s dead husband and recognizes him as someone she met while a
kidnap victim of Jacob Ness.
The three distinctive characters are well-defined and
interesting, revealing secrets as the story progresses and uncovering other
secrets about Evie’s husband, father, and mother, and about Flora’s kidnapper. Peripheral
characters are also distinct and interesting. The setting is in Boston, my
favorite city. The complex plot kept me guessing.
An excellent novel by a first-rate author.
Seven teenagers go camping and only six return. A massive search
doesn’t turn up Aurora, at fourteen, the youngest of the group. Thirty years
later, her body is found in a hollow
beneath a tree along with remnants of a stash of drugs.
The timeline alternates
between current and the night of the murder. Point-of-view shifts
between cops and campers, both present and thirty years prior. The author does
a good job of switching time and POV, and I didn’t find it confusing.
Lodge paints good pictures of each of her many characters—four
police and the six campers (seven with Aurora)—each character unique. She even
adds a couple of extras into the mix. It may be a little overload on character
She keeps us guessing about the murderer, but I did have an
idea of who it was early in the story. The plot could be a little slow for some
readers, but I found the details of police procedural interesting.
A good first novel. I look forward to the next book in the
series with DCI Jonah Sheens.
The duo of authors Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child is
fascinating to me. They write seamlessly together. As an author, I am curious
about how the collaboration works. I’ve tried writing with others, and it
worked only one time. When it gelled, it was fruitful and fun, but you could
tell we were two authors. With Preston and Child, it feels like one.
Also intriguing—Agent Pendergast is still an interesting protagonist after eighteen books. I find it difficult to continue with the same characters into a second novel. I prefer starting with a new story and new characters.
Needless to say, excellent read.
This novel would rate five stars except there’s far too much
Evan Smoak is Orphan X. The Orphan program was a deep,
dark, black-ops program where children were recruited and trained as assassins.
Evan was taken from a group home at age twelve and lived with his trainer/mentor
until he was nineteen and went out into the field on his first assignment. The
Orphans were never told why their targets were
chosen, only that they were enemies of the United States. Later Even
left the program and became “The Nowhere Man” who worked for people in desperate
need of help.
The U.S. president, who used to run the Orphan program, is now
eliminating all the Orphans. When Evan’s mentor is
murdered, he decides to go after President Bennett. But Evan is also
Bennett’s number one target. Evan’s first assignment as an Orphan is one the
president particularly wants to hide.
At the same time, Evan is working a case as The Nowhere Man,
helping a young man with autism whose family has been wiped out by a drug
Evan is violent and indestructible. He has access to all the
right people to get the job done. If you can get beyond the unbelievable
traits, he’s interesting and likable.
Strange but captivating—but that’s true of most literary
novels that hold my interest (many don’t). The story is philosophical and the
plot is complicated, so I won’t try to describe it except to say John Woman has
an interesting interpretation of history. If you like to read a book that makes
you think, this is a good candidate.
Mosley is known for his mystery/crime/detective stories with
Easy Rawlins, Fearless Jones, or others. This is the second standalone literary
novel of Mosley’s that I’ve read, and I thoroughly enjoyed both.