This novel is my introduction to a well-known mystery
writer. Jumping into the last book of Ann Cleeves’ Shetland Island series with
DI Jimmy Perez, I found the story easy to read as a stand-alone and will likely
go back and read more of her work.
The author’s depiction of the setting makes me want to visit
the small village on a remote island in the far north UK. The characters are
equally well defined. A family has moved to the island from London, in part to
provide a better life for their two children. Christopher, their autistic son
who has a liking for fire, is one of the main characters in the story. He finds
the body of a neighbor’s nanny hanging from the rafters of their shed, where
the previous owner of their home committed suicide.
The mystery stays unsolved until the end. The suspects are
many, beginning with the family and including a bitter town gossip who becomes
the next murder victim.
I would recommend this well-written book to anyone who loves
a good mystery.
Helen Clapp (first-person POV) is a physics professor at MIT
and a single mother with a seven-year-old son, Jack, by an anonymous donor. Her
best friend, Charlotte (Charlie), has died, but Helen is receiving text
messages from her phone. I believe this is the plotline, but the author touches
on it only occasionally throughout the story.
Billed as a ghost story, it’s more about Helen’s disbelieve
in the afterlife or ghosts. I would classify the novel as women’s fiction or
literary. It’s mostly about friendship and relationships.
Charlie’s husband and daughter (Terrence and Simmi) come to
Boston from California to be closer to Charlie’s parents after her death, and
they move into an apartment in Helen’s house. Their children, Jack and Simmi,
become friends. Neel, an old flame and research partner of Helen’s returns to
MIT. Much of the book is Helen remembering times spent with Charlie or Neel.
Freudenberger covers a lot of science, which I found
interesting but much too detailed, even though I enjoy physics. As a successful
woman in the male-dominated world of science, Helen spends too much time
worrying about what others think of her.
I enjoyed the book, although it didn’t have much of a plot.
The characters were interesting, if not always likable.
In this dark, dystopian novel set in Golden State, a future California,
lying is the worst of all crimes. Laszlo Ratesic, an officer in the Speculative
Service, is trying to solve anomalies in a case where a roofer fell from the
top of a house and died. He can sense lies. His partner, a recruit to the
service, is even better at this skill than Laszlo. In following the details of
the incident, they uncover a plot to undermine “the truth.”
The story is set in a world of complete surveillance where
everyone is required to record all of their actions and add them to the
official “Record” each day. The only books allowed are books of fact. Any
history before the founding of the Golden State and anything outside its
boundaries are “unknown and unknowable.”
Although brainwashed, the main character was interesting.
The plot was good, and there were surprises at the end.
Not a bad read.
Sara is running from a Hurricane headed for the Outer Banks
of North Carolina and also trying to escape witness protection. She rescues two
children, Cassie and Boon, who are home alone in the apartment next door. She’s
torn between finding someplace to drop the children and staying off the radar,
so the agents don’t track her.
All the characters are intense and twisted but interesting.
I’m not sure who the title character is supposed to be, since everyone is lying
and/or a liar’s child. Hank, a retired sheriff, is almost unnecessary to the
plot. He’s haunted by a missing son who disappeared years earlier at age ten.
Whit, Cassie and Boon’s father, is dealing with the disappearance of his wife
while holding down a demanding job and taking care of the two children. Cassie,
age twelve, tries to fit in with the older kids in the neighborhood by dressing
Goth. Five-year-old Boon sleeps in his closet.
The story feels repetitive at times, but each time we see the “facts” from a different point of view, we learn a little more of the “truth.” It kept my interest to the end, and I liked the ending.