I decided to read this nonfiction book after reading the
author’s novel, Scrublands. I wanted
to learn more about Australia and the area where the story took place. I’ve
never visited Australia, but I can picture the drought-ridden area of
Queensland and New South Wales now that I’ve read The River. Chris Hammer is an excellent writer.
Hammer spent weeks and months traveling the Murray-Darling
river basin. He introduces us to the residents of this harsh land, tells their real
stories, their memories, and their yarns. He covers the heartbreak of failing
towns and farms, the determination and humor of the people who live there.
There are lessons in this book about water and how we use
and abuse it. Hammer doesn’t preach, he gives us the differing opinions of the
people living with the lack of water. Some of those lessons are relevant to the
US as well as Australia.
I just returned from an awesome trip into the Amazon
rainforest without leaving my home. All my senses are on overload. Erica
Ferencik not only excites sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch, she introduces
you to a variety of alien cultures and characters, pulls at your emotions, plucks
your heart strings, and teaches you about the unique environment of the jungle.
She is an extraordinary storyteller.
Into the Jungle is
my favorite read this year.
I haven’t read a Dan Brown novel in years. I gave up after The Da Vinci Code and Angels & Demons. As you can read in
many of the reviews, he’s not the best writer. But a friend gave me a copy of Origin recently, so I read it.
Where do we come from? Where are we going?
These are the two questions to be answered by the “big reveal” that is the central plot of the novel. There is lots of philosophical discussion about the questions and the differences between religion and science—some interesting, some repetitive. But in my opinion (and maybe the author’s), the big reveal doesn’t truly answer either question. And I guessed the villain of the story early on, so the ending fell flat for me.
enjoyed Spain. Brown’s description of the art, architecture, landscape, and
culture made me want to visit. But even some of this was repetitive.
it was an interesting read, but it could have been much shorter.
The author takes us into Riversend, a small dying settlement
in Australia’s interior, in the middle of a summer drought. The river running
through the town has dried into cracked earth. You can feel the heat and see it
rising off the baked land.
A priest shot five men in front of the church and was killed
by the local policeman. Martin Scarsden’s editor at the newspaper sends him to
visit Riversend a year after the shooting to write a piece about how the locals
are coping with the tragedy. At first, Martin is a typical newsman interviewing
residents—outside looking in. The town is full of secrets and rumors, which
cause Martin to write articles for his paper with incorrect facts, gaining
enemies. As he gets to know them, people ask why a priest that many admired and
loved did such a terrible act. Martin’s curiosity and desire to find the truth
have him looking for the answer. This is the central question in the story.
Hammer’s characters are varied and complicated, not always
who or what they appear to be at first meeting. He even gives us insight into
the dead priest.
The plot is complicated, with many twists and turns. It kept my interest from beginning to end.